Citroen Xsara 1997 vs Renault Laguna 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 123 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Laguna is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara engine produces 20 HP less power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Renault Laguna. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 8.3 | |
|
The Renault Laguna is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller. Citroen Xsara is 41 cm shorter than the Renault Laguna, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`300 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Renault Laguna has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Renault Laguna, so Renault Laguna quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |