Citroen Xsara 1997 vs Citroen Xsara 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Citroen Xsara 1997 engine produces 7 HP less power than Citroen Xsara 2000, but torque is 6 NM more than Citroen Xsara 2000. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 7.6 | |
|
The Citroen Xsara 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara 1997 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara 2000, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara 1997 could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Citroen Xsara 2000 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Citroen Xsara 2000 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Citroen Xsara 2000 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xsara 1997 is 2 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara 2000, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |