Citroen Xsara 1997 vs Citroen Xsara 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 147 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara 2000 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara 1997 engine produces 20 HP less power than Citroen Xsara 2000, whereas torque is 12 NM less than Citroen Xsara 2000. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara 1997 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Xsara 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Xsara 1997 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara 2000, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara 1997 could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara 1997 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara 2000. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Xsara 2000 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Peugeot 206, Peugeot 306, Citroen Xsara Picasso, Peugeot 106 | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara 2000 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Citroen Xsara 2000 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Citroen Xsara 2000 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Citroen Xsara 2000 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.19 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xsara 1997 is 2 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara 2000, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |