Citroen Xsara 1997 vs Volkswagen Golf 1997

 
Citroen Xsara
1997 - 2000
Volkswagen Golf
1997 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 75 HP75 HP
Torque: 112 NM128 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.1 seconds14 seconds
Citroen Xsara and Volkswagen Golf have the same engine power, but Citroen Xsara torque is 16 NM less than Volkswagen Golf. Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.26.6
Real fuel consumption: 6.9 l/100km7.3 l/100km
By specification Citroen Xsara consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 90 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen Xsara consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 750 km in combined cycle830 km in combined cycle
930 km on highway1030 km on highway
780 km with real consumption750 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.17 m4.15 m
Width: 1.70 m1.74 m
Height: 1.40 m1.44 m
Citroen Xsara is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Golf.
Gross weight (kg): 1`100no data
Safety:
Quality:
below average

high
Volkswagen Golf has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf, so Volkswagen Golf quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 6001200
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara has
  • lower price
Volkswagen Golf has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv