Citroen Xsara 1997 vs Renault Laguna 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 75 HP | 110 HP | |
Torque: | 112 NM | 148 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
Renault Laguna is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara engine produces 35 HP less power than Renault Laguna, whereas torque is 36 NM less than Renault Laguna. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.2 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
930 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
780 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Renault Laguna gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Renault Laguna 2001 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Laguna 2001 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.17 m | 4.58 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
Citroen Xsara is smaller. Citroen Xsara is 41 cm shorter than the Renault Laguna, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Laguna. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`300 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Citroen Xsara has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Laguna, so Citroen Xsara quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Renault Laguna has
| |