Citroen Xsara 1997 vs Mazda 323 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 NM | 134 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda 323 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara engine produces 15 HP less power than Mazda 323, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Mazda 323. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.36 m | |
| Citroen Xsara is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda 323, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen Xsara is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 300 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mazda 323, which means Citroen Xsara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`575 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mazda 323 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Mazda 323, so Mazda 323 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Mazda 323 has
| |