Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Seat Cordoba 2007
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 137 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 NM | 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Xsara engine produces 32 HP more power than Seat Cordoba, whereas torque is 37 NM more than Seat Cordoba. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.9 | |
|
The Seat Cordoba is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Cordoba, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
| Citroen Xsara is 9 cm shorter than the Seat Cordoba, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen Xsara is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 485 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Cordoba. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Seat Cordoba has
| |