Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Renault Clio 2001
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 71 HP | 80 HP | |
Torque: | 125 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.8 seconds | 15 seconds | |
Renault Clio is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara engine produces 9 HP less power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Renault Clio. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 50 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.19 m | 3.81 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.64 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
Citroen Xsara is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen Xsara is 38 cm longer than the Renault Clio, 6 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 510 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.3 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.4 metres more than that of the Renault Clio. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | low | |
Citroen Xsara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Clio has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Renault Clio has
| |