Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Seat Cordoba 2007

 
Citroen Xsara
2000 - 2003
Seat Cordoba
2007 - 2009
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol

Performance

Power: 110 HP105 HP
Torque: 147 NM153 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 seconds10.6 seconds
Citroen Xsara is more dynamic to drive.
Citroen Xsara engine produces 5 HP more power than Seat Cordoba, but torque is 6 NM less than Seat Cordoba. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.96.9
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres45 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Citroen Xsara 2000 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ...  More about Citroen Xsara 2000 1.6 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.19 m4.28 m
Width: 1.70 m1.70 m
Height: 1.40 m1.44 m
Citroen Xsara is 9 cm shorter than the Seat Cordoba, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen Xsara is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data485 litres
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Cordoba.
Gross weight (kg): 1`1001`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

below average
Average price (€): 8001400
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara has
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv