Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Seat Cordoba 2007
Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 147 NM | 153 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
Citroen Xsara is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Xsara engine produces 5 HP more power than Seat Cordoba, but torque is 6 NM less than Seat Cordoba. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.9 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 45 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Citroen Xsara 2000 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Citroen Xsara 2000 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.19 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
Citroen Xsara is 9 cm shorter than the Seat Cordoba, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen Xsara is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 485 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Cordoba. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
| |