Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000
Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 147 NM | 135 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 16.5 seconds | |
Citroen Xsara is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Xsara engine produces 20 HP more power than Citroen Xsara Picasso, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Citroen Xsara Picasso. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 6.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.7 | |
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 54 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
980 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.19 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.64 m | |
Citroen Xsara is smaller. Citroen Xsara is 9 cm shorter than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 24 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Citroen Xsara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 900 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 6.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
| |