Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Citroen C2 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 143 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Citroen C2 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara engine produces 15 HP less power than Citroen C2, but torque is 4 NM more than Citroen C2. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.9 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 41 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Citroen Xsara 2000 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Citroen Xsara 2000 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 3.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is larger, but lower. Citroen Xsara is 52 cm longer than the Citroen C2, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 166 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 879 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`415 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Citroen C2 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Citroen C2, so Citroen C2 quality is probably better | ||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Citroen C2 has
| |