Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Opel Corsa 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 71 HP | 65 HP | |
Torque: | 125 NM | 130 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.8 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
Opel Corsa is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara engine produces 6 HP more power than Opel Corsa, but torque is 5 NM less than Opel Corsa. Despite the higher power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 4.7 | |
The Opel Corsa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Corsa, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 44 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
1080 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.19 m | 3.82 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.44 m | |
Citroen Xsara is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen Xsara is 37 cm longer than the Opel Corsa, 5 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 260 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1060 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 9.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.8 metres more than that of the Opel Corsa, which means Citroen Xsara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`505 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | below average | |
Citroen Xsara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Corsa has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Opel Corsa has
| |