Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Skoda Octavia 2000

 
Citroen Xsara
2003 - 2004
Skoda Octavia
2000 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 71 HP90 HP
Torque: 125 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 15.8 seconds13.2 seconds
Skoda Octavia is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen Xsara engine produces 19 HP less power than Skoda Octavia, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Skoda Octavia. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.25.0
The Skoda Octavia is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Citroen Xsara consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Octavia, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara could require 180 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 870 km in combined cycle1100 km in combined cycle
1080 km on highway1300 km on highway
Skoda Octavia gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.19 m4.51 m
Width: 1.70 m1.73 m
Height: 1.40 m1.43 m
Citroen Xsara is smaller.
Citroen Xsara is 32 cm shorter than the Skoda Octavia, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.1 metres less than that of the Skoda Octavia.
Gross weight (kg): 1`100no data
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Skoda Octavia has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Citroen Xsara, so Skoda Octavia quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 8001200
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara has
  • lower price
Skoda Octavia has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv