Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Seat Leon 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 110 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 147 NM | 148 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.7 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
Citroen Xsara is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Xsara engine produces 5 HP more power than Seat Leon, but torque is 1 NM less than Seat Leon. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 6.9 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
980 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
730 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Citroen Xsara 2003 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Citroen Xsara 2003 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.19 m | 4.18 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.46 m | |
Citroen Xsara is 1 cm longer than the Seat Leon, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres less than that of the Seat Leon. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`100 | 1`200 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Citroen Xsara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Seat Leon has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara, so Citroen Xsara quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
| |