Citroen Xsara 1998 vs Renault Scenic 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 167 HP | 80 - 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 - 205 NM | 127 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 17.2 seconds | 8.6 - 15.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 9.4 | 5.0 - 8.6 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Scenic. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller. Citroen Xsara is 9 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`955 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |