Citroen Xsara 1998 vs Honda Civic 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.6 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 167 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 - 205 NM | 140 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 - 17.2 seconds | 10.1 - 11.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 9.4 | 7.0 - 8.1 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.38 m | |
| Citroen Xsara is 29 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen Xsara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 405 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.7 metres more than that of the Honda Civic, which means Citroen Xsara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Honda Civic has
| |