Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Renault Megane 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 167 HP | 95 - 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 127 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 15.8 seconds | 8.6 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 9.3 | 5.2 - 7.6 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Megane. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.37 m | |
| Citroen Xsara is 22 cm longer than the Renault Megane, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen Xsara is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 288 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.6 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Citroen Xsara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`543 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Renault Megane has
| |