Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Toyota Celica 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citroen Xsara is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Toyota Celica is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.8 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Citroen Xsara is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 167 HP | 143 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 172 - 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 15.8 seconds | 7.4 - 8.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 9.3 | 7.7 - 8.4 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Celica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller, but higher. Citroen Xsara is 15 cm shorter than the Toyota Celica, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |