Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Honda Civic 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.7 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 167 HP | 120 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 152 - 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 15.8 seconds | 9.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 9.3 | 6.8 - 7.0 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
| Citroen Xsara is 25 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 441 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.9 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Citroen Xsara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`583 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Honda Civic has
| |