Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Audi A2 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 167 HP | 61 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 126 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 15.8 seconds | 9.8 - 14.8 seconds | |
| In general, Citroen Xsara are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Audi A2. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 9.3 | 2.9 - 5.9 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi A2. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is larger, but lower. Citroen Xsara is 36 cm longer than the Audi A2, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1085 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.4 metres more than that of the Audi A2. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`100 kg | ~ 1`452 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Audi A2 has
| |