Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Skoda Fabia 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 137 HP | 64 - 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 112 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 16 seconds | 10.1 - 18.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 7.7 | 4.5 - 7.8 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Skoda Fabia. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Fabia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is larger, but slightly lower. Citroen Xsara is 15 cm longer than the Skoda Fabia, 5 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 426 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1225 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Fabia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`086 | ~ 1`641 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Skoda Fabia has
| |