Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Citroen Xsara 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 137 HP | 68 - 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 112 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 16 seconds | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 7.7 | 5.2 - 9.1 | |
|
Citroen Xsara 2000 petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara 1997. On average, Citroen Xsara 2000 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara 1997. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.40 m | |
| Citroen Xsara 2000 is 20 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara 1997, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen Xsara 2000 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`086 | ~ 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Citroen Xsara has
| |