Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Toyota Corolla 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 110 HP | 90 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 130 - 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 16 seconds | 10.2 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 7.6 | 5.9 - 7.9 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Corolla. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller. Citroen Xsara is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla, which means Citroen Xsara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`083 | ~ 1`225 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Toyota Corolla has
| |