Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Peugeot 406 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.7 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 110 HP | 90 - 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 160 - 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 16 seconds | 9.4 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 7.6 | 5.7 - 10.2 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 406. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 406. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller. Citroen Xsara is 37 cm shorter than the Peugeot 406, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1741 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.8 metres less than that of the Peugeot 406, which means Citroen Xsara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`083 | ~ 2`075 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
| |