Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 110 HP | 90 - 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 135 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 16 seconds | 10.8 - 15 seconds | |
| In general, Citroen Xsara Picasso are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Citroen Xsara. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 7.6 | 4.9 - 8.7 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xsara Picasso. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.64 m | |
| Citroen Xsara is 9 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara Picasso, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 550 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.8 metres less than that of the Citroen Xsara Picasso, which means Citroen Xsara can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`083 kg | ~ 1`267 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |