Citroen Xsara 1997 vs Nissan Almera 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 135 HP | 75 - 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 - 205 NM | 116 - 136 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | 11 - 16.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 9.1 | 6.1 - 8.2 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Almera. On average, a Citroen Xsara with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Nissan Almera. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 4.14 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xsara is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Almera, 1 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 340 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.3 metres more than that of the Nissan Almera. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`591 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Nissan Almera has
| |