Citroen Xsara 1997 vs Suzuki Baleno 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citroen Xsara is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Suzuki Baleno is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.6 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 135 HP | 96 HP | |
| Torque: | 112 - 205 NM | 134 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 9.1 | 7.3 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Baleno. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.17 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is larger. Citroen Xsara is 27 cm longer than the Suzuki Baleno, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 1.3 metres more than that of the Suzuki Baleno, which means Citroen Xsara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`100 | ~ 1`100 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Suzuki Baleno has
| |