Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 137 HP | 55 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 106 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 15.8 seconds | 10.7 - 17.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 7.7 | 4.5 - 7.4 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Polo. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is larger, but lower. Citroen Xsara is 29 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1030 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`086 | ~ 1`530 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |