Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Renault Megane 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 137 HP | 80 - 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 127 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 15.8 seconds | 6.5 - 14.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 7.7 | 4.5 - 8.8 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Megane. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.21 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller. Citroen Xsara is 2 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 330 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1190 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Megane. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`086 | ~ 1`778 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Renault Megane has
| |