Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Renault Laguna 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 137 HP | 101 - 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 148 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 15.8 seconds | 8.1 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 7.7 | 5.4 - 10.1 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Laguna. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Laguna. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller. Citroen Xsara is 39 cm shorter than the Renault Laguna, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.2 metres less than that of the Renault Laguna. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`086 | ~ 1`377 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.4/10 | 6.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
| |