Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Renault Kangoo 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Citroen Xsara is available only with front wheel drive, while Renault Kangoo can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.0 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 137 HP | 55 - 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 81 - 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 15.8 seconds | 10.7 - 21.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 7.7 | 5.3 - 8.6 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Renault Kangoo. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is larger, but lower. Citroen Xsara is 19 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, 4 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 44 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2600 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.1 metres less than that of the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`086 | ~ 1`684 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |