Citroen Xsara 2000 vs Citroen Xantia 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 - 137 HP | 75 - 194 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 135 - 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 15.8 seconds | 8.2 - 17.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 7.7 | 5.5 - 11.6 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xantia. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xantia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.38 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara is smaller, but slightly higher. Citroen Xsara is 33 cm shorter than the Citroen Xantia, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.3 metres less than that of the Citroen Xantia. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`086 | ~ 1`461 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Citroen Xantia has
| |