Citroen Xsara 2003 vs Ford Fiesta 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 68 - 137 HP | 60 - 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 - 250 NM | 109 - 204 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 - 16.7 seconds | 9.9 - 17 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.7 | 4.2 - 6.5 | |
|
Citroen Xsara petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta. On average, Citroen Xsara equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.19 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.48 m | |
| Citroen Xsara is 24 cm longer than the Ford Fiesta, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 295 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 979 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Citroen Xsara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`088 | ~ 1`503 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |