Citroen Xsara Picasso 2003 vs Opel Meriva 2003
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 125 HP | |
Torque: | 190 NM | 170 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12.3 seconds | |
Citroen Xsara Picasso engine produces 11 HP more power than Opel Meriva, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Opel Meriva. Despite the higher power, Citroen Xsara Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.8 | |
The Opel Meriva is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Meriva, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara Picasso could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 52 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
780 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
Opel Meriva gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 9 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 407, Peugeot 206 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Zafira, Opel Vectra, Opel Signum | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Opel Meriva 2003 1.8 engine: Mechanically reliable engine, but the engine control unit can cause problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.04 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.64 m | 1.62 m | |
Citroen Xsara Picasso is larger. Citroen Xsara Picasso is 24 cm longer than the Opel Meriva, 6 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1410 litres | |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage capacity. Citroen Xsara Picasso has 200 litres more trunk space than the Opel Meriva. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 1 metres more than that of the Opel Meriva, which means Citroen Xsara Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`835 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 6.0/10 | 7.1/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Opel Meriva has
| |