Citroen Xsara Picasso 2003 vs Citroen Xsara 2000

 
Citroen Xsara Picasso
2003 - 2004
Citroen Xsara
2000 - 2003
Body: Minivan / MPVHatchback
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 136 HP137 HP
Torque: 190 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds8.6 seconds
Citroen Xsara is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen Xsara Picasso engine produces 1 HP less power than Citroen Xsara, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 3.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.77.7
Real fuel consumption: 8.5 l/100km8.0 l/100km
The Citroen Xsara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara Picasso could require 150 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres54 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
780 km on highway960 km on highway
630 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption
Citroen Xsara gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 11 years11 years

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.19 m
Width: 1.75 m1.70 m
Height: 1.64 m1.40 m
Citroen Xsara Picasso is larger.
Citroen Xsara Picasso is 9 cm longer than the Citroen Xsara, 5 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 24 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 550 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 0.8 metres more than that of the Citroen Xsara, which means Citroen Xsara Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`3001`100
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 1000800
Rating in user reviews: 6.0/10 8.4/10
Pros and Cons:
    Citroen Xsara has
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • better manoeuvrability
    • higher ratings in user reviews
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv