Citroen Xsara Picasso 2003 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 137 HP | |
Torque: | 190 NM | 191 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
Citroen Xsara Picasso 2003 engine produces 1 HP less power than Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 8.7 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 54 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
780 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
630 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xsara Picasso 2003 and Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.5 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`300 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
| |