Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara Picasso engine produces 46 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, but torque is 27 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 9.2 | |
|
The Citroen Xsara Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 3.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 555 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Citroen Xsara Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 44 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 206, Citroen C5, Peugeot 306 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
| Citroen Xsara Picasso is 1 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, 5 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1800 litres | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Citroen Xsara Picasso has 120 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Runner. The Mitsubishi Space Runner may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 1.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Citroen Xsara Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |