Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara Picasso engine produces 12 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Star. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1190 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Citroen Xsara Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 206, Citroen C5, Peugeot 306 | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Star might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen Xsara Picasso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mitsubishi Space Star 2001 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Mitsubishi Space Star 2001 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso is larger. Citroen Xsara Picasso is 25 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 3 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1370 litres | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage capacity. Citroen Xsara Picasso has 180 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 1.9 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means Citroen Xsara Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`730 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |