Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000 vs Ford C-Max 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Citroen Xsara Picasso engine produces 25 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 75 NM less than Ford C-Max. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| 1000 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso is smaller, but higher. Citroen Xsara Picasso is 5 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Citroen Xsara Picasso has 90 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The Ford C-Max may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Citroen Xsara Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`850 | 1`995 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.0/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |