Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.7 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.2 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara Picasso engine produces 35 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen Xsara Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 40 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Peugeot 407, Citroen C5 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Space Runner | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso is smaller. Citroen Xsara Picasso is 32 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 550 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 240 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means Citroen Xsara Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.0/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |