Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.5 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000 engine produces 5 HP less power than Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.5 | |
| Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000 could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000 and Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |