Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 vs Opel Meriva 2005

 
Citroen Xsara Picasso
2004 - 2007
Opel Meriva
2005 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 137 HP125 HP
Torque: 191 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.5 seconds12.3 seconds
Citroen Xsara Picasso engine produces 12 HP more power than Opel Meriva, whereas torque is 21 NM more than Opel Meriva. Despite the higher power, Citroen Xsara Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.77.8
The Opel Meriva is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Meriva, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara Picasso could require 135 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle660 km in combined cycle
780 km on highway850 km on highway
Opel Meriva gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 11 years9 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Peugeot 407, Peugeot 206Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Zafira, Opel Vectra, Opel Signum
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara Picasso might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.04 m
Width: 1.75 m1.69 m
Height: 1.64 m1.62 m
Citroen Xsara Picasso is larger.
Citroen Xsara Picasso is 24 cm longer than the Opel Meriva, 6 cm wider, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1410 litres
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 1 metres more than that of the Opel Meriva, which means Citroen Xsara Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`3001`835
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

average
Opel Meriva has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Citroen Xsara Picasso has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Opel Meriva, so Opel Meriva quality is probably better
Average price (€): 22002600
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara Picasso has
  • more power
  • lower price
Opel Meriva has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv