Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 vs Ford C-Max 2007

 
Citroen Xsara Picasso
2004 - 2005
Ford C-Max
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.7 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 115 HP125 HP
Torque: 160 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 seconds10.8 seconds
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving.
Citroen Xsara Picasso engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.77.1
Real fuel consumption: 9.0 l/100km8.6 l/100km
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara Picasso could require 90 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
910 km on highway980 km on highway
600 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption
Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.37 m
Width: 1.75 m1.82 m
Height: 1.64 m1.60 m
Citroen Xsara Picasso is smaller, but slightly higher.
Citroen Xsara Picasso is 9 cm shorter than the Ford C-Max, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data550 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1620 litres
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 0.8 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Citroen Xsara Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`3001`910
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 22002200
Pros and Cons:
    Ford C-Max has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • lower fuel consumption
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • better manoeuvrability
    • fewer faults
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv