Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 vs Dacia Duster 2013

 
Citroen Xsara Picasso
2004 - 2005
Dacia Duster
2013 - 2017
Body: Minivan / MPVCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.7 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 115 HP105 HP
Torque: 160 NM148 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.2 seconds13 seconds
Citroen Xsara Picasso is more dynamic to drive.
Citroen Xsara Picasso engine produces 10 HP more power than Dacia Duster, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Dacia Duster. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.78.0
Real fuel consumption: 9.0 l/100km8.6 l/100km
The Dacia Duster is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise.
By specification Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster.
Fuel tank capacity: 54 litres50 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 700 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
910 km on highway710 km on highway
600 km with real consumption580 km with real consumption
Citroen Xsara Picasso gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Dacia Duster 2013: Duster`s 4x4 system is adapted from Nissan Quashqai. It has 2WD, AUTO and LOCK modes which are selectable with a button. In 2WD mode the vehicle is FWD. In AUTO mode, the vehicle is normally FWD, but if wheel slip occurs, the rear wheels are engaged to gain traction. In LOCK mode (available at speeds up to 60km/h), the center differential splits torque 50/50 front/rear.

Engines

Engine production duration: 8 years26 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Peugeot 407, Citroen C5Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Megane, Nissan Almera, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Duster might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Citroen Xsara Picasso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.32 m
Width: 1.75 m1.82 m
Height: 1.64 m1.63 m
Citroen Xsara Picasso is smaller, but slightly higher.
Citroen Xsara Picasso is 4 cm shorter than the Dacia Duster, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data473 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1636 litres
Turning diameter: 11.5 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 1.1 metres more than that of the Dacia Duster, which means Citroen Xsara Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`3001`800
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average

low
Average price (€): 22006400
Pros and Cons: Citroen Xsara Picasso has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Dacia Duster has
  • has 4x4 drive
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv