Citroen Xsara Picasso 2005 vs Renault Scenic 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Citroen Xsara Picasso) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Renault Scenic) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara Picasso engine produces 20 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 153 NM less than Renault Scenic. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara Picasso could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 680 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Citroen Xsara Picasso 2005 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Citroen Xsara Picasso 2005 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.62 m | |
| Citroen Xsara Picasso is 2 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 406 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has more luggage capacity. Citroen Xsara Picasso has 144 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 0.8 metres more than that of the Renault Scenic, which means Citroen Xsara Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Citroen Xsara Picasso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Citroen Xsara Picasso, so Citroen Xsara Picasso quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |