Citroen Xsara Picasso 2005 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 16.5 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso 2005 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Xsara Picasso 2005 engine produces 20 HP more power than Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara Picasso 2005 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.7 | |
|
The Citroen Xsara Picasso 2005 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Citroen Xsara Picasso 2005 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara Picasso 2005 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xsara Picasso 2005 and Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |