Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 vs Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Golf Plus is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara Picasso engine produces 7 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf Plus, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Volkswagen Golf Plus. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Plus, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara Picasso over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Plus. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 910 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A3, Volkswagen Touran | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 1.6 engine Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009 1.6 engine: This engine is simple and reliable, rarely causing significant issues for owners. Fluctuating idle speed is often linked to a clogged fuel pump strainer or air leaks in the intake system. If vibrations or ... More about Volkswagen Golf Plus 2009 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.59 m | |
| Citroen Xsara Picasso is 8 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf Plus, width is practically the same , while the height of Citroen Xsara Picasso is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 395 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Golf Plus, which means Citroen Xsara Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Volkswagen Golf Plus has
| |