Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 vs Opel Zafira 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 14.3 seconds | |
|
Opel Zafira is a more dynamic driving. Citroen Xsara Picasso engine produces 10 HP less power than Opel Zafira, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Opel Zafira. Due to the lower power, Citroen Xsara Picasso reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Zafira, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Citroen Xsara Picasso could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen Xsara Picasso consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Zafira. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Zafira gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Vectra, Opel Meriva | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen Xsara Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Citroen Xsara Picasso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso is smaller. Citroen Xsara Picasso is 19 cm shorter than the Opel Zafira, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 140 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 140 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1820 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Citroen Xsara Picasso is 0.4 metres more than that of the Opel Zafira, which means Citroen Xsara Picasso can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 2`075 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Opel Zafira has
| |