Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 95 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 16.5 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 engine produces 5 HP more power than Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.7 | |
| Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xsara Picasso 2004 and Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 900 | 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |