Citroen Xsara Picasso 2006 vs Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.8 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso 2006 is more dynamic to drive. Citroen Xsara Picasso 2006 engine produces 20 HP more power than Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000. Thanks to more power Citroen Xsara Picasso 2006 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Citroen Xsara Picasso 2006 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000, which means that by driving the Citroen Xsara Picasso 2006 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Citroen Xsara Picasso 2006 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 54 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.64 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Citroen Xsara Picasso 2006 and Citroen Xsara Picasso 2000 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 550 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
|
Citroen Xsara Picasso has
| |